| Team | Played | For | Against | Diff. | Points | WR*1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Lachlan Tobin | 4 | 12 | 3 | 9 | 4 | 100% |
| 2. Charlie Tear | 4 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 3 | 75% |
| 3. Bowman Bergquist | 4 | 5 | 6 | -1 | 1 | 25% |
| 4. Huck Steele | 4 | 5 | 9 | -4 | 1 | 25% |
| 5. Krishiv TARWAY | 4 | 5 | 9 | -4 | 1 | 25% |
The competition table is correct based on any results that are available.
1 The WR column is a Win Ratio. It calculates the number of points
received, out of the number of points possible, and is the basis for ranking the
competition tables. It is a fair measure, especially if
teams do not play an equal number of games.
| Charlie Tear | Krishiv TARWAY | Huck Steele | Bowman Bergquist | Lachlan Tobin | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Charlie Tear |
Charlie Tear won!
3 — 2
|
Charlie Tear won!
1 — 3
|
Charlie Tear won!
—
|
Lachlan Tobin won!
0 — 3
|
|
| Krishiv TARWAY |
Charlie Tear won!
3 — 2
|
Huck Steele won!
0 — 3
|
Krishiv TARWAY won!
3 — 0
|
Lachlan Tobin won!
3 — 0
|
|
| Huck Steele |
Charlie Tear won!
1 — 3
|
Huck Steele won!
0 — 3
|
Bowman Bergquist won!
0 — 3
|
Lachlan Tobin won!
3 — 1
|
|
| Bowman Bergquist |
Charlie Tear won!
—
|
Krishiv TARWAY won!
3 — 0
|
Bowman Bergquist won!
0 — 3
|
Lachlan Tobin won!
2 — 3
|
|
| Lachlan Tobin |
Lachlan Tobin won!
0 — 3
|
Lachlan Tobin won!
3 — 0
|
Lachlan Tobin won!
3 — 1
|
Lachlan Tobin won!
2 — 3
|
