| Team | Played | For | Against | Diff. | Points | WR*1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Norah Fox | 4 | 12 | 1 | 11 | 4 | 100% |
| 2. Aime Lacquiere | 4 | 10 | 3 | 7 | 3 | 75% |
| 3. Kayla Goonewardena | 4 | 6 | 7 | -1 | 2 | 50% |
| 4. Elka Low-Nang | 4 | 4 | 11 | -7 | 1 | 25% |
| 5. Capri Coleman | 4 | 2 | 12 | -10 | 0 | 0% |
The competition table is correct based on any results that are available.
1 The WR column is a Win Ratio. It calculates the number of points
received, out of the number of points possible, and is the basis for ranking the
competition tables. It is a fair measure, especially if
teams do not play an equal number of games.
| Norah Fox | Aime Lacquiere | Elka Low-Nang | Kayla Goonewardena | Capri Coleman | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Norah Fox |
Norah Fox won!
3 — 1
|
Norah Fox won!
0 — 3
|
Norah Fox won!
0 — 3
|
Norah Fox won!
3 — 0
|
|
| Aime Lacquiere |
Norah Fox won!
3 — 1
|
Aime Lacquiere won!
3 — 0
|
Aime Lacquiere won!
3 — 0
|
Aime Lacquiere won!
0 — 3
|
|
| Elka Low-Nang |
Norah Fox won!
0 — 3
|
Aime Lacquiere won!
3 — 0
|
Kayla Goonewardena won!
1 — 3
|
Elka Low-Nang won!
2 — 3
|
|
| Kayla Goonewardena |
Norah Fox won!
0 — 3
|
Aime Lacquiere won!
3 — 0
|
Kayla Goonewardena won!
1 — 3
|
Kayla Goonewardena won!
3 — 0
|
|
| Capri Coleman |
Norah Fox won!
3 — 0
|
Aime Lacquiere won!
0 — 3
|
Elka Low-Nang won!
2 — 3
|
Kayla Goonewardena won!
3 — 0
|
